Figure 5 shows the streamfunction every 60
days. Figure 6 shows the time series of the
streamfunction at eastern and western edges
of the ridge. The annual range of the calculated
volume transport is nearly the same as that
of the nontopographic Sverdrup transport
east of the ridge because the flat bottom region extends
east of the ridge. However, the annual range
decreases drastically west of the ridge compared
to that of the nontopographic Sverdrup transport
at the same point. The signal of the time-dependent
part of the volume transport is prohibited
from crossing the ridge due to the topographic
ƒÀeffect. As a result, the annually averaged
part of the solution (steady-state solution)
is dominant in the western portion of the
ridge.
Although the annual range of the volume transport
variation west of the ridge is much smaller
than that of the Sverdrup transport there,
volume transport varies in time slightly.
Figure 7 shows the time series of the streamfunction
at the western edge of the ridge; time series
is the same as in Fig.6 except for the enlarged scale
of the ordinate. Also shown is the time series
of the volume transport calculated by a one-layer
numerical model with the ridge driven by
the same time-varying wind stress. In the
one-layer model, only the variation with
the annual range of about 3 Sv leaks to the
west of the ridge. On the other hand, the
annual range is about 10 Sv in the volume
transport variation in the two-layer model.
This means that the baroclinic activity amplifies
the annual range of the volume transport.
Figure 8 shows the y-t (distance from the southern sidewall-time)
plot of the streamfunction along the western
edge of the ridge. It is found that the phase
is delayed northward.